So... It's been a while.
So... Let's talk Frequencies... I've mentioned the subject lots of times in the previous posts, and I "long ago" decided, that in this post I'm not going to explain what role does the subject play in general and stuff like that, - and just start really quick on the subject itself. I couldn't do that without the proper explanation/preparation done beforehand. That is what I dealt with in the previous post. I remember firmly, that by finishing the last post I was sure, that pretty much all of the needed-to-be-made preparation had been made in the post, and thus I could do the thing I wanted to do, which is the thing, highlighted in this color. So yeah, let's begin, shall we?
So..:
The Subject of Frequencies applies to Everything, that could be called "human experience". One of the problems is that many people think that they are the best at... For example, - explaining the situation, [when one had done something, that he had never done before, and not to do that thing was one of his principals (a firm opinion), - and really liked it, when he/she had always hated it for a good reason, and that's why he/she had never done it, ever since discovering a thing about it, that made him/her form the strong opinion (principal)].(For future refference, - "11Frq, Pattern #7")
Every person understands that situation perfectly, because, - I can bet you 100$, - everyone had been in that particular situation at least once in their lifetime, and, - moreover, - even if somebody had never before found himself to be in that situation, and is told about what had happened (informed of the situation), so that it is understood, - than he definitely will understand what that situation is "like". He would definitely understand...
The Frequency of it.
d ...The DEGREE of it. I had explained Frequencies already before in this sense.
The problem here is that everyone has a thing to say on the subject of 11F, Patt.7, which is perfectly okay, but since the subject is Taboo and nobody mentions it, and everybody ignores it, - what we get is that "one *does not know* whether or not somebody else except for him at all is:
1. - thinking about it;
2. - understands it;
3. - understands it, as well as he/she does;
4. - Really, - is interested in it;
etc... As a result of this, - when 11F-Ptrn#7 takes place, and one tries to explain what had happened, - he does it in such a fashion, that makes it seem as if the people he adresses are (1:38**) NOT "positive", so to speak, - in points 1;2;3;4, - which is ridiculous. He/she does not behave in a way, that would show people, that he, at least, - assumes that they might be: 1) - aware of what he/she's talking about; 2) - understands it too... AT LEAST those two points, okay? - At LEAST.
What you get, as a result of pretending there is no such subject, (one of the things) mainly, - is that everyone takes interest in it, which means that everyone takes interest in it, and anyway, - knows how big it really is, - and so, - one takes interest in trying to solve/understand/explain it him/herself, and, at least, - only for him/herself, - to worry NOT, about it.
What you get as a result of this, + the pretending that there's no such thing, - is that everyone who takes interest in it/thinks about it/etc. - thinks, that he/she is: either the only one who does that; the only one who is capable of explaining it; the one who understands it REALLY, - and, - either the only one, or one of the (very) few, - and, in this case, - the best at it(understanding, explaining, etc.) out of the people that actually try to form an understanding of it.
You get all of this also (probably most fundamentally, -->) because of false sense of personal identification (ego).
What people, that think the things, highlighted in this color, - don't realize, - is their Frequency.
